Macbeth Coursework Essay

Refer ring to the three main motion-picture shows that the witches bulge out in, write astir(predicate) the effect they give to the play as a whole and also how they entrance Macbeth to be name as he does.Macbeth, a tragic story of how greed posterior corrupt the mind. written in 1606 for queen regnant pile the first, great deal did practiceually believe in witches. I my-self believe that William Shakespeargon utilize the witches as the fuel for his play, I call back this led to the massive success of Macbeth.When citizenry purview of force James the first they may defecate also thought of witches. After all James did advertize his beliefs and thought in witches. He believed that they had an effect on his life. The batch of his countries (England and Scotland) would take a crap thought it was completely mean(prenominal). Now a day, if someone acc enforced someone of being a witch, the accuser would be looked upon in society as insane.The psyche of witches oer the age has simply dried out.In class we pull in watched and studied two unlike films based on Macbeth. One was Macbeth on the Estate. This was extremely different to what I expected. Produced in 1996 its quite a modern film. I thought it was incredible how they managed to use every word from Macbeth, (the play its-self) and fit it into a modern set. The film was filmed on an terra firma on Birmingham and the main characters were young street yobs Personally I turn over it mustiness(prenominal) have been a hard job for the film producers to re-film Macbeth into a modern time.An a nonher(prenominal) film was retributive called Macbeth produced in 1971 its quite an old film. It was though exactly what I expected. It was a brilliant film and only a few features let it down. Music which I think back plays a hulking role in films and plays because it allows us to understand the mood and feeling of the play/film. I think technology was to blame for this thoughDid the witches have an effect on the audience? Yes of course did. Why? Simply because witchcraft contend an big offset in the lives of the large number who lived during the period of the 1500s to the 1600s. I mean, going out to town, bowling is all normal besides what about going to see the local witch been executed publicly? 300 years ago this would as normal as any of the activities above. Back and so I think concourse were fascinated with witches. Witches held so much mystery and had a force of fear surrounding them. Of course this is what people thought, if people went to see Macbeth at the theatre in Leeds, obviously I tangle witht think people would have as much inte residual as people 300 years ago. thither would be interest in the witches Im not saying the opposite, but not as much as back then. I think it would make the audience wonder how and why the people of the 1600s lived like they did.The witches seem in three main scenes in Macbeth issue 1 scene 1Act 1 scene 3Act 4 scene 1In act 1 scene 1 they, to me, introduce the play. Although we often forget that the play is all about witchcraft, thinking about it, the witches do play an important give out in Macbeth. I think when Shakespeare wrote act 1 scene 1 his intentions were to grip the audience at the very beginning. The witches do not appear to do anything in this scene it seems as if theyre t present to introduce them-selves, they dont rightfully appear for a reason. I think its just to hype the audience up for the rest of the play.In act 1 scene 3 the witches tell us basically what Macbeth is about. Shakespeare grips the audience still tighter when they sayFIRST trance All do Macbeth, hail to thee Thaneof Glamis.SECOND WITCH All hail Macbeth, hail to thee Thaneof Cawdor.THIRD WITCH All hail Macbeth, that shalt beKing hereafter.I think Shakespeare here uses repetition really well. It adds mystery and feeling to the play. A Victorian audience at this moment must be really into the play. The mystery deepens even more when less than a few scenes away a messenger arrives to tell Macbeth that he is now Thane of Cawdor.A modern audience at this point must shiver with excitement. A Victorian audience may have done the same, after all these people did fear witches in their day.In act 4 scene 1 I dont really feel that this scene does much for the play. both(prenominal) people may disaccord and I enkindle see why. I mean people sat their reading the book must be thinking, how the hell on earth can a tree move?This is because Macbeth saysMACBETH Who can impress the forest, bid the treeUnfix its earth-bound root?This go forth hold the line the reader wondering, I wonder when this prophesy will come true?I think they would think this because they want to see how the tree ends up moving this was clever on Shakespeares part this would have helped keep the audience interested. There are three prophesies all which tell Macbeth when to start worrying.The manner of speaking the witches use is strange even for Shakespeares time Another thing is that the lines are shorter than the lines in other parts of the play. I dont think this is a coincidence, I personally think Shakespeare did this to keep the witches poesys simple. I think he did this to keep the audience interested and not put them off.The use of rhyme people often forget that poetic writing doesnt have to rhyme, in fact in the play there isnt really much rhyming going on, but when the witches speak in Macbeth therere speeches do rhyme unlike most parts of the play.To add even more mystery to the witches they use strange ingredients in their potions I mean we all expect strange items but not that strange. Cats tongues, guts, eyes what more do we want? I think this would have helped Shakespeare with his audience. I think they would have loved the idea of witches around a cauldron especially JamesGoing back and looking at these two scenesAct 1 scene 3Act 4 scene 1We see that Macbeth is involved in both scenes. In act 1 scene 3 we see Macbeth as a worrier for his country, a gentleman. In this scene he bumps into the witches with Banquo his best friend. From what I can tell Macbeth is a bit shocked I think this because he basically asks them what they are, I think he doubts that they are human. I think this because Macbeth saysMACBETH Speak if you can what are you?The witches then tell Macbeth that he shall be Thane of Cawdor then King. Banquo interrupting seems more enthusiastic about talking to the witches who then tell Banquo his children shall be Kings. Maybe Macbeth is trying to take in what hes just been told. I think Macbeth wants to believe the witches but he doesnt want to get his hopes up. Thats why hes looking for a reason, he asksMACBETH By Sinells death I know I am Thane of Glamis,But how, of Cawdor? The Thane of Cawdor livesA prosperous gentlemanThe witches then vanish and Macbeth is left talking to Banquo. I think Macbeth is still avoiding taking about him been King, he saysMACB ETH Your children shall be Kings.In Act 4 snapshot 1 we see Macbeth as a murderer and a evil man or should I say King. He barges onto the scene and demands resolvings from the witches I know this because he saysMACBETH Howeer you come to know it, answer meThree apparitions then go on to tell Macbeth three thingsOne that he should be apprised of Macduff,Two that he should he should be aware of anyone not born from a womens uterus andThree that he should we weary when the woods begin to move. I think at this point in the play Macbeth is worried about Banquos children and what the witches told Macbeth at the beginning of the play. I think this because he saysMACBETH back end tell so much-will Banquos issue everReign in this Kingdom?The witches do not give Macbeth his answer. I think the reason for this is because if the audience know the answer to this question then they can figure out the end of the play.As Ive already said, I do think the witches played an enormous part in Macbe th. I also think that they play a rather big part in Macbeths life after all arent they really the ones responsible for King Duncans death? I think they are. I think this because at the end of the day the witches gave Macbeth the idea of killing the witch. I think as soon as the third witch saysTHIRD WITCH All hail Macbeth, that shalt beKing hereafter.I think this is, in a way the poisonous substance been injected into Macbeths blood. Its only a matter of time before it begins to kick in, and when it does Macbeth will think up his plans to murder King Duncan. Another reason I think the witches are to blame is because Macbeth wouldnt have done it with out them I think this because Macbeth says to his wife when she pushes him into murdering DuncanMACBETH We will proceed no provided in this businessHe also saysMACBETH So foul and fair a day I have not seen.I think the above proves he wouldnt have murdered Duncan if he had not met the witches. I dont think the witches are all to blame though, I dont think Lady Macbeth helps either shes always trying to push Macbeth into committing murder. Some people in the audience may wonder if Lady Macbeth is a witch or perhaps the witches have put a spell on her?I have seen two different interpretations of the witches on sort out and both were extremely different. Obviously the two versions were Polanskis version and Macbeth on the Estate.In Polanskis version the witches were what you would expect, old ugly women who lived in a miry smelling cave but in Macbeth on the estates version the witches were played by three children who lived in an old abandoned flat. I thought this was a rather interesting (and clever) concept.Both films were very good but if I had to select one which I thought was the most effective (concerning the witches only) I would choose Polanskis version. This is because the witches were exactly what I expect and want. You dont want sweet little children playing the part of horrible witches. It just isn t Macbeth. It rips the whole idea of witches into shreds or to be more precise it doesnt follow the stereotype. Some people may think this is a bad thing but I would have to disagree with them.However in Polanskis version the witches are brilliant theyre ugly, theyre old, theyre dirty and theyre naked. I also think Polanskis version was better because we saw the witches using magic. For shell when they faded out into thin air. It was what I expected and the reasons above are the reasons I choose Macbeth over Macbeth on the Estate.